Day-to-day log during visits after 2013
Click here to return to the main index.
2-1-14. I have returned to the Pearl for a visit. It was nice to see the
Tree 6 area again. After the original rigging of that tree was lost in a storm last year, I decided to transfer the line from the pulley to a carabiner that is attached to
the strap that is down and to the right of the pulley. Last spring, I tried to do some maintenance on the trail to Tree 9, but it was blocked by a fallen tree and nearly a year of overgrowth. I managed to find parts of the trail and reroute it around the fallen tree. The rigging on Tree 9 still appears to be in good shape.
2-2-14. It has now been eight years since my first sighting. I decided not to go out since it was raining this morning. I started having back spasms last night, but I should be ready for swamp duty by tomorrow.
2-3-14. I did some exploring on the Mississippi side near Tree 7. There is good habitat in this secluded area, which is directly across the Pearl from where there have been sightings on the Louisiana side.
2-4-14. I spent a few hours in Tree 9 on a foggy morning. This tree is near the locations where there have been sightings, it is fairly easy to access, and it offers a good view in all directions. Some footage from Tree 9 is posted here.
2-6-14. Last year, I made two unsuccessful attempts to replace the rigging in Tree 8, which was lost in a storm. It takes a perfect shot with a bow and arrow to thread the needle and get a line up that tree. Each time I have gotten a line in place, there has been a problem with the end of the rope getting stuck in the fork. I wrapped the end of the rope with duct tape this time, and it passed through the fork. It was a wet and chilly day, and the rain and show started coming down while I was on the way up. Tree 8 is in a good location, and it provides a good view about 87 feet above the bayou.
3-28-14. I’m on the way back to the Pearl for another visit. Since the trail and tree maintenance was finished during the previous visit, there should be more time for stake-outs and searching during this visit. While viewing the discussion of the 2007 video on YouTube, someone noticed something interesting during the double knock event. There is a red glow about the head a few seconds before the double knock, when the bird is making the side-to-side motions. It also shows up several seconds earlier when the bird is climbing. This is apparently the first footage that has been obtained in recent decades in which the sex is resolved.
3-29-14. I left my house yesterday afternoon to begin another exciting journey to the Pearl River. After 1440 miles of driving, I arrived — right back at my house. I checked the water level in the Pearl before leaving, but a huge storm raised it up to flood level. I got all the way to Alabama before finding out about the flood, and then I did a U-turn. It has now been six years since my last sighting.
11-5-14. I have returned to the Pearl for a visit. I had a nice observation session in Tree 8, where I heard four double knocks around this time of year in 2009. It was windy, and the bird activity was low.
Some footage from Tree 8 is posted
11-6-14. I spent some time in Tree 9, which provides a nice view over areas where Ivory-billed Woodpeckers have been observed. It was windy again, but there was more bird activity than the day before. There are some dead trees nearby where woodpeckers were foraging. Gretchen joined me for her first climb since turning 60. Some footage from Tree 9 is posted
11-7-14. I began my work in the Pearl River exactly nine years ago. I have various aches and pains from the past few days. So I’m resting today. In the video footage that I posted from Tree 9, I mentioned a tree in the distance that could be Tree 8. Based on the bearing, apparent distance, and other clues, I’m now convinced that it must indeed be that tree.
11-8-14. I enjoyed a long observation session in Tree 5, which is located to the south of the area where I’ve had sightings. This tree provides an excellent view in all directions. The surrounding area is remote and has lots of tall cypresses that would seem to be good candidates for roosting and nesting. I had a few close calls with cottonmouths on the way back. Some footage from Tree 5 is posted
11-9-14. It’s a bit of an ordeal to carry climbing gear out to Tree 5. I will take a day to rest up. Just before getting to the top of Tree 5, I noticed that lichen was growing on the strap that holds the pulley in place. That made me feel a little uneasy, but then I noticed that the strap has significant damage after more than seven years of exposure to the elements. Since the rope was looped over a strong branch, I wouldn’t have fallen to my death, but it would have been an unsettling partial fall if the strap had snapped. The pulley makes it easy to pull the rope into place, but it increases the chances of the line getting caught up after big storms. I lost the riggings of Trees 0, 6, and 8 when moss and branches got snagged by the line and wouldn’t pass through the pulley. I now just run the line through a carabiner. It’s harder to pull the rope into place, but I haven’t lost any more riggings.
11-10-14. I kayaked up the bayou to the
Tree 6 area. The weather continues to be nice, and woodpecker activity picked up. Some paddle-cam footage is posted
11-11-14. I spent a few hours in Tree 6. During the flyunder in 2008, the bird flew just to the side of the tupelos in
this photo. Some footage from Tree 6 is posted
11-12-14. I’m resting today, but I hope to get out to the swamp again before returning to Virginia. Gretchen obtained some nice photos during the visit to Tree 5.
This one shows Tree 5 from below.
I’m visible in the crown in this photo, which gives an impression of the sturdiness of Tree 5. In the lingo of tree climbers, it contains several “bomber” branches near the top.
11-13-14. It’s raining this morning. I’ve always wondered how much weight I was toting around the swamp. The backpack contains cameras, GPS, laser rangefinder, water bottles, and various other items. I used to carry a lot more, such as an extra video camera. I’ve never felt burdened by the backpack, but the climbing gear isn’t easy to carry miles into the swamp. I usually wear the harness. The bag with over 200 feet of climbing rope must be carried, and it’s the most unpleasant part of the load. With the reduced amount of stuff that I’ve been carrying lately, it all comes to about 40 pounds. I take about 27 pounds of that up the trees. Not too bad, but it adds to the fatigue when combined with hiking and climbing. It can really be a pain when when sinking up to your knees in marshy areas.
11-14-14. I spent a few hours in Tree 6 this morning before starting the drive back to Virginia. It was in the low 30s and windy and my feet were wet. I kept watch from a different branch, which provides a different view down the bayou. Bird activity was low. A woodcock flushed from the edge of the trail as I was walking back.
2-8-15. It was nice to be back in the Pearl River on a spring-like day with lots of woodpecker activity. I hiked along the bayou between the areas where the videos were obtained in 2006 and 2008. There have been signs of ivorybills in that area a few times over the years. I noticed that someone stole the rigging line from Tree 6. It took a lot of work to replace the line in that tree after it was lost in a storm. I won’t have time to do it again during this visit. I also went by Tree 8 and found that the rigging line appears to be intact.
2-9-15. I spent the morning to the northeast of the area that I visited yesterday. Once again, there was a good deal of woodpecker activity. It’s interesting to see the fluctuations in the numbers of certain species. During my first few years in the Pearl, I only saw a few Red-headed Woodpeckers. Then there was a huge influx and they were abundant for several years. Now they seem to be gone again. It seems that there are more Orange-crowned Warblers this year than in previous years.
2-10-15. All nine of my sightings in Louisiana were along about three miles of a
winding bayou. I spent this morning looking for signs of ivorybills in areas between bends in the bayou. I visited Tree 9 and saw a rotten tree that looks like it could topple at any moment. I also took some photos of the
nearly black mud near Tree 6. The white trailing edges on the dorsal surfaces of the wings are prominent in the 2008 video. Some of the black on the wings is also visible, but the dark mud in the background makes it harder to see than the white. I flushed an American Woodcock.
2-11-15. After enjoying a nice sunrise, I hiked out to Tree 9 and had a pleasant observation session up there. A sapsucker was looking down at me as I was pulling the rope into place. After climbing to the top, I noticed that it has been very active up there. I obtained footage of a
Pileated Woodpecker in flight over the treetops in the distance (the movie plays at half speed). This was the type of event that I had in mind for ivorybills when I started using tall trees for observations, but the one in
the 2008 video
flew nearly directly below. The time has come to head back north.
7-21-15. I have returned to the Pearl for a brief visit. This morning, I visited the area near
Tree 6. It was hot and humid, and there was little bird activity.
7-22-15. I climbed Tree 8 and enjoyed
the view from 87 feet above the bayou. A Mississippi Kite was perched and calling nearby, but it flew away before I got the camera out. I encountered several cottonmouths while walking along the bayou. It would be nice to spend more time in the trees, but I need to head back north today.
2-2-16. On this date ten years ago, I had my first of ten Ivory-billed Woodpecker sightings. I was hoping to spend some time in the Pearl this winter, but those plans have been postponed due to flooding.
7-21-16. I have spent the past several days investigating the possibility of using a drone with a 4K camera for searching for Ivory-billed Woodpeckers. The approach seems very promising. Video footage from several test flights is available here.
8-31-16. I got my first high-definition video camera ten years ago. It was the Sony HDR-HC3. I wore out two of them during my work in the Pearl River. I just had a chance to try out a Sony FDR-AX53, which records in 4K. There have been some amazing developments during the past ten years. This camera has a better zoom and better stability. It also has a nice viewfinder — the quality is almost as if you’re looking through binoculars. If only I had that camera when I obtained the 2006 video. It was a standard camera, and I wasn’t able to spot the bird in the viewfinder. I tried unsuccessfully to spot it in binoculars. With this camera, I’m certain that I would have found the bird in the viewfinder immediately. Then I would have zoomed in and obtained footage comparable in quality to the film from the Singer Tract. Another advantage of this camera is that it records to an SD card that holds 256 gigs. The old cameras use DV tapes, which cause loss of time and battery power during rewinds, make lots of mechanical noise (especially after lots of use), and require playback to get the data onto a computer.
1-18-17. I have returned to the Pearl in order to get some drone footage of the swamp in the winter.
1-19-17. This is the tenth anniversary of the day on which I saw a pair of Ivory-billed Woodpeckers in Geoff Hill’s study area in the Choctawhatchee and obtained video footage of several events involving flights, behaviors, field marks, and other characteristics that can only be explained in terms of the Ivory-billed Woodpecker.
1-20-17. I launched the drone from a boat for the first time. The combination of a motorboat and a drone makes it possible to cover a large portion of a river basin that would have seemed unimaginable ten years ago.
1-24-17. A paper on video evidence for the persistence of the Ivory-billed Woodpecker was published today in Heliyon. This paper contains an analysis of several events that appear in the 2007 video and extensions of the analysis of the 2006 and 2008 videos that was published in a
previous paper. It also contains an analysis that suggests that the expected waiting time for obtaining a clear image of an Ivory-billed Woodpecker is millions of times greater than it would be for a more typical species of comparable rarity. I did a drone flight up English Bayou while following along in a motorboat. Drone footage is available here.
2-7-17. I have returned to the Pearl for a brief visit. I spent the morning exploring areas further to the north near Henleyfield, Mississippi, but the weather wasn’t suitable for flying the drone.
2-8-17. I flew the drone at the Old River WMA. I tried to find a trail that I used about ten years ago to access the swamp. I found what appeared to be the old trailhead, but the trail must have grown over.
2-12-17. I flew the drone again at Old River WMA. Drone footage is available here.
5-7-17. I started having persistent back pain after doing some heavy lifting during a sea trip in the fall. Two months ago, it developed into sciatica after I crawled under a sink in an awkward position to replace a bathroom faucet. I could barely get out of bed for a few weeks. Severe pain in my left leg made it nearly impossible to sleep. After the first month of rehab, it seemed a great triumph just to be able to walk a few blocks from home. It will be a while before I’m able to hike in the swamp and carry a backpack loaded with gear.
10-2-17. A paper that discusses the double knocks of the Ivory-billed Woodpecker was published today in
Scientific Reports. The concept of a harmonic oscillator is used to explain how the
double and multiple knocks of Campephilus woodpeckers are related to the periodic drumming that is typical of other woodpeckers. This work was motivated by the fact that the woodpecker in the 2007 video appears to produce a double knock with only one thrust of the body. The idea materialized while studying footage of a drumming Pileated Woodpecker. After the body stopped thrusting, there were a few additional impacts by the bill. This led to the hypothesis that both types of signaling can be modeled in terms of a harmonic oscillator but with different types of forcing, which is periodic for drumming but impulsive for double and multiple knocks. When the forcing for drumming ends, the last few impacts are related to a double or multiple knock. The hypothesis was confirmed from a video of a Pale-billed Woodpecker that produces a double knock with only one thrust of the body (this footage may be viewed in the supplementary material). Video footage of a Magellanic Woodpecker producing a double knock with only one thrust of the body appears in Part 6 of The Life of Birds by David Attenborough.
3-3-18. I now have the capability of sending a drone out on search missions. During some recent tests, I found that large woodpeckers are identifiable in 4K video obtained from a cruising altitude of 40 meters, which is high enough to avoid collisions. Video footage from some of the tests is available
here. I have acquired a drone that has a better camera and will be testing it soon.
3-11-18. A paper that discusses the possibility of using a drone to search for the Ivory-billed Woodpecker and inspect habitats was published today in
11-1-18. Having sciatica last year led to the discovery of two potentially deadly health problems. An MRI of the back revealed calcification in the prostate, which isn’t necessarily serious. This motivated me to get a PSA test, which came back borderline. A year later, the PSA suddenly increased by a large amount, and a biopsy confirmed an early stage of cancer. A scan to make sure it hadn’t spread revealed pulmonary embolisms. On this date, I had robotic surgery at Johns Hopkins. A follow-up scan revealed that blood thinners had dissolved the embolisms.
2-10-19. After starting to regain my strength after the surgery, I decided to spend some time in the Pearl River this month. I obtained drone footage of a Pileated Woodpecker plummeting from the top of a tree. I initially thought it could be an Ivory-billed Woodpecker on the basis of the unusual diving flight and a prominent white feature on the back, which would be consistent with dorsal stripes, but there are other clues that indicate that it’s a Pileated Woodpecker. The flight doesn’t seem to be consistent with that species, but it could be that it was an urgent flight toward cover below when the bird suddenly detected the drone and felt vulnerable on the exposed snag. I did a
drone flight more than two miles up English Bayou, beginning at the mouth on the East Pearl River, passing over the locations where I observed Ivory-billed Woodpeckers in 2006, and ending at the site where the flyunder video was obtained during my final sighting in 2008.
7-2-19. A paper that covers several aspects of my work on the Ivory-billed Woodpecker was published today in
Statistics and Public Policy. That journal was the perfect place for discussions of the analysis of video evidence in terms of statistics and probability and why the requirement for a particular type of evidence has been a failed conservation policy for several decades. The paper has an extended presentation of an analysis (that was originally presented in a 2017 paper) of the expected waiting time for obtaining a clear photo (the amount of time it would be expected to take on average to obtain such evidence) relative to the time it would take for a species of comparable rarity that has more typical behaviors and habitat. The paper also has a section on a long history of folly and politics that has undermined the conservation of the Ivory-billed Woodpecker, including incidents decades ago (that were apparently not discovered until recently) and comments by anonymous reviewers that help to reveal the depth of the folly and politics.
3-9-20. Video footage obtained during three encounters with Ivory-billed Woodpeckers was published today in raw digital form at a
data archive along with metadata (extracted by a curator at the archive) that confirms that the digital video is genuine and when it was obtained. This archive might be useful to anyone who wishes to reproduce or extend my analysis of the videos. One of the advantages of putting the raw data out there is to debunk nonsense, such as a claim by a reviewer of a submission to the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. As discussed in the Appendix of this paper, the reviewer suggested that the speed of
the 2008 video was fraudulently modified in order to increase the apparent flap rate and flight speed by a factor of two. A prominent ornithologist (who specializes in woodpecker flight mechanics) analyzed that video and concluded from the wing motion that it shows a large woodpecker in flight. Only two large woodpeckers occur north of the Rio Grande in North America. The flap rate of the bird in the video is about ten standard deviations greater than the mean flap rate of the Pileated Woodpecker (the flap rate statistics of that fairly common species are known), which rules out that species and leaves only one possibility (the flight speed and other characteristics are also inconsistent with Pileated Woodpecker). By resorting to a suggestion of fraud, the reviewer essentially conceded that the Ivory-billed Woodpecker is the only plausible explanation for the bird in the video. One of the many unusual incidents that have occurred since the announcement of the rediscovery of the Ivory-billed Woodpecker in 2005 is that the editor allowed the comment to stand. It seems that the right thing to do (in the interest of getting at the truth) would have been to inspect the raw digital video, from which it is easy to confirm that the video has not been modified.
6-30-20. In the middle of the COVID-19 pandemic, I drove to Louisiana to do some kayaking and drone flights in the Pearl. In order to minimize the risk of exposure, I stayed in a hotel room in Slidell that has direct access to the outside, which made it possible to bring the kayak indoors at night. There probably isn’t much chance of a sighting at this time of year, but the beauty of the Pearl peaks in late June. I obtained
this video while kayaking up English Bayou.
7-1-20. I wrapped up the visit by doing a few drone flights over hardwood habitats several miles to the north of the areas where I had sightings in the Pearl.
9-3-20. What may be the final paper about my work on the Ivory-billed Woodpecker was published today in
Scientific Reports. This paper discusses the possibility of using image processing techniques to extract information from the videos. Not being an expert in image processing, I was limited in my exploration of this approach to using applications to vary quantities such as color, brightness, and contrast. The videos are available in raw digital form at a
data archive to experts in image processing, who could potentially extract additional information with advanced techniques.
3-7-21. I arrived at the Pearl for a visit on my 63rd birthday.
3-8-21. I launched a drone from the site where the 2006 video was obtained in order to confirm the location. There had been claims that the video shows a Campephilus woodpecker that was filmed in the tropics. Although it’s easy to debunk the claim merely by noting that the leaves were down (this happens during the winter in Louisiana but not in the tropics), it was worthwhile to confirm the location. The drone was launched from near the location where I was sitting in a kayak while obtaining the video in 2006. Trees that are still identifiable appear in the first part of the
drone footage, which shows landmarks such as the bends in English Bayou and the East Pearl River as well as the rocket towers and canal at Stennis Space Center. I used a DJI Osmo+ to obtain a
stable video footage of the boat ride up English Bayou, starting at its mouth on the East Pearl to the location where I had five sightings during a five day period in February 2006. The Osmo+ is made by the same company that makes Phantom drones, and it has similar stabilization capability that is based on a gimbal. Note that trees in the distance don’t appear to move up and down in the video.
3-9-21. During the years when I was having sightings in the Pearl, I usually remained in the kayak (especially near the most sensitive areas) in order to avoid driving the birds away. Another motive for that approach was that it was difficult to hike through the aftermath of Katrina. On this day, I finally did my first hike between the locations where the 2006 and 2008 videos were obtained. I was surprised at how easy it was to walk through the forest now that the trees that fell during Katrina are mostly gone. I started the hike at the site of the 2008 video. Not long after beginning the return from the site of the 2006 video, I heard the best double knock I have ever heard in the field. I don’t put much stock in isolated double knock sounds, but I will have to try to spend some time in that area.
3-11-21. I did the hike between the 2006 and 2008 video sites again. This time, I used the Osmo+ to obtain
stable video footage of the habitat while walking.
3-13-21. I launched a drone from the site where the 2008 video was obtained.
This footage shows the observation position near the top of Tree 6, a view down the bayou of trees that are still identifiable, and surrounding landmarks from higher altitude. I did a few additional drone flights to inspect habitat and confirm that Tree 5 was still standing. I would like to do some observations from that tree, which provides an exceptional view out over the treetops of the hardwood zone where there were sightings and a large grove of cypresses that might be suitable for roosting or nesting. Now that the aftermath of Katrina is gone, it would be much easier to hike out to that tree for observation sessions than it was years ago. This footage illustrates what it was like to hike through parts of that area during the first few years after Katrina.
3-14-21. I wrapped up the visit with a few additional drone flights over hardwood habitats.